AVID:Requests for Comment/Making The Wiki More Reliable With Use of Sources
So if you have noticed, some users are not liking the current direction of the site as it still has information that maybe opinionated, even if the infamous factors and the nickname section is gone now, so I have this idea to make the site more reliable.
Basically, what this site can use for notable information, especially legacy sections and nicknames, can be legit and reliable sources. These can help users know how the logo made a real impact to the community. Some legacy sections do not need sources though, since they could describe something in the logo while not opinionated.
So yeah, that is what I planned out. If it goes out well, the wiki will have some more notable information. If you want to know why I made this? Some RFCs would like to suggest changing the wiki a lot, for better or for worse. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 04:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Support
Support Bingo. 
· Talk · Edits 05:11, 28 November 2022 (UTC)- Support Good idea
(The Third Place) 09:06, 28 November 2022 (UTC) - Support I've always wondered why that wasn't really implemented as much in the past. But I'm going ahead with it. Doctorine Dark (talk) 13:29, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Support AVID is back!!
(• USER TALK! •) 13:40, 4 December 2022 (UTC) - Support. This will help strengthen the quality of the wiki in the post-CLG era. --Pingu (talk) 00:53, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Support This is one of the things that will make the wiki even better than ever! EsaïeGregoryPrickett (talk) 21:30, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
