AVID:Requests for Comment/New sections; The return of Scare and Cheesy Factors

The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

SNOW closing as failed per overwhelming consensus.FryLetterman (talk) 18:45, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

New sections and the return of Factors

Here are the new sections

Criticism/Controvers(y/ies) (optional): like Trivia, but used for Criticism and Controversies of the logo.

Irony: Used to add comments that are opinionated and are only based on your sole judgement. This is what to be used instead of Legacy for options.

Cheese Velocity (Formerly Cheesy Factor) (optional): Same as Cheesy Factor, but different name.

Scare Velocity (Formerly Scare Factor): Same as the Scare Factor, but different name.

Emotion Velocity: Similar to Scare Factor, it’s to tell how this logo makes you feel emotional.

More too come soon… — Preceding unsigned comment added by BKBluey (talk • contribs)

Support

Abstain

Oppose

Oppose No. (I tried to use a Monopoly No reaction I uploaded but it failed) (Talk!) 17:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Please don't. SnowflakesOmega (talk) 15:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Yeah, it's clear we're not going back to those anytime soon. If I have to judge these sections on their own, then a lot of them are too synonymous with one another (Cheese Velocity is literally Criticism/Controversy) and they are simply bringing back a generally deconstructive element without improving any of its flaws. Camenati (talk) 15:27, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose No. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 15:28, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose These were removed for a reason.ForcedExcess26 (talk) 15:34, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Hard no. We've been removing opinionated comments because they, quite frankly, insulted the reader's intelligence. We are not a reception wiki. We are an archive. Safe to say this proposal won't be passing. (Lets chat!) 15:38, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I don't even need to tell you why. Compooper (talk) 15:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose No. Just no. (Discussion area ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 15:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose. We removed the Cheesy and Scare Factors for a reason. Dominicmgm (talk) 15:43, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose yeah... no. let's just forget about this. (таʟк) 15:43, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose There is no way we're doing it. PM pinter (talk) 16:02, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Per everyone. Please tell me this is a joke. Gilby1385 (talk) 16:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per everyone. Logohub (talk) 16:15, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose do i even need to say anything at this point? Airvibes (talk) 16:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose н е т LurkingManiac (talk) 17:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose absolutely very not necessary. JackAMLA (talk) 17:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
NancerAVID (talk) 19:04, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose No way!Speedy Cervhiche (talk) 18:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Do you really think we're gonna bring back the scare/cheesy factors? A snowball in Death Valley has a better chance of survival than your request FryLetterman (talk) 18:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Nope. (talk) 18:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose This is an unconstitutional move. ∞~𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮-𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙨~∞ (꧁𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙜𝙚꧂) | (꧁𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙨꧂) 18:45, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments

This proposal is taking a quick ride into snow close. To try and salvage discussion material from this: why do you feel the return of these sections is necessary? What function would they serve that is not currently available? This could be fleshed out in a forum discussion or heck, use my talk page if it is too minor for that. Editing this because it will probably be snow-closed too quick for the OP to respond. --Raidarr (talk) 15:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.