AVID:Requests for Comment/Reimplementing Print Logos
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Implementing A New Portal For Print Logos
My First Idea For Reimplementing Print Logos Is To Make A New Portal For Print Logos Where It Would Be A Sub Portal Under Production Logos.Pearno (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Pearno
Support
Support I go to a school with a firewall that blocks Fandom for some reason, so this could come in handy for me. Also, some people might be too lazy to switch from AVID to Logopedia, and I never even saw any reason to get rid of the print logos, so I would be fine with this section returning. Sonicfan19198282 (talk) 11:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- There are several reasons we got rid of print logos. And I can't think of anyone who'd be too lazy to simply change tabs. Trevor807 (talk) 12:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- The reasoning provided for this support is very half-baked in my opinion. It is extremely easy to change tabs, no harder than clicking on a different page button on AVID. I also don't see the purpose of adding hundreds of pages just because one place has a firewall that blocks another site. Eternity Media Group (talk) 01:30, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
- OpposeForcedExcess26 (talk) 15:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose: Logopedia already does print logos better. That's why we got rid of them in the first place. Trevor807 (talk) 16:48, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Trevor already explained why the print logos were pulled in the first place (and a RfC that included removing print logos played a role in print logos being removed). Obviously, for the same reason as Trevor (plus the fact that a RfC removed print logos), I'm out. AUnnamedDragon 1:37 PM, July 19, 2023 (CET)
- Oppose Why can't you just "sign your star". This RfC (with the removal of print logos) was closed with sucessful votes, that's why print logos "were" removed. AZEEM4HADZRIE (🎙 · 📜) 02:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. Eternity Media Group (talk) 11:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Number 1 (continued below)
- Oppose Gilby1385 (talk) 15:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose print logos are NEVER EVER EVER coming back! (Talk to Me!) 08:31, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose One word. Logopedia. If you want print logos, go on there rather then implementing it again on a website that is CLEARLY about Audiovisual Identity, rather then print logos.
- Oppose Per everybody, and this user's grammar is terrible by the way. As I Am Demonstrating, He Capitalizes Evey Word In A Sentence. Shawn the Logo Fan 2006 (talk)
- Oppose Per everyone here. I ain't here for some Logopedia business. Tabit (talk) 12:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Comments
Implementing A New Tab For Print Logos
My Second Idea For Reimplementing Print Logos Is To Make A New Tab For Print Logos In The Same Fashion As The VIdeos And Images Tabs Each Logo Has .Pearno (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Pearno
Support
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose For the same reason I opposed proposal 1, I'm out. AUnnamedDragon 1:40 PM, July 19, 2023 (CET)
- Oppose again. Don't mind what I say on #1. AZEEM4HADZRIE (🎙 · 📜) 02:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. Eternity Media Group (talk) 11:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- (continued from above) Oppose Number 2 (continued below)
- Oppose Gilby1385 (talk) 15:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose again. Trevor807 (talk) 12:17, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose ForcedExcess26 (talk) 12:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose same as above (Talk to Me!) 08:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per everybody. And Don't Type Like This, Pearno. Shawn the Logo Fan 2006 (talk)
Comments
A New Sub Page For Print Logos
My Third And Final Idea To Reimplement Print Logos Is To Make A New Sub Page For Print Logos In The Same Fashion As The Logo Variations And Trailer Variation Tabs On A Page.Pearno (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Pearno
Support
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose None of your proposals work for me. And as a result, you gon' walk away from this RfC with nothing. So for the same reason I opposed the other proposals, yep, I'm out. AUnnamedDragon 1:44 PM, July 19, 2023 (CET)
- (continued from above) Oppose Number 3 Sorry, but none of your proposals appear to be solid and don't demonstrate why they need to be re-added back to the wiki. Logopedia is already more effective in covering print logos than we ever were in its lifespan here. Compooper (talk) 18:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Like two above. Do not explain to me why. AZEEM4HADZRIE (🎙 · 📜) 02:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. Eternity Media Group (talk) 11:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Gilby1385 (talk) 15:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose It's a no for every single one of these. Didn't we have an RfC similar to this last year? Yeah, still a no for me. 10:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose again. Trevor807 (talk) 12:17, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose ForcedExcess26 (talk) 12:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose same as above
- Oppose Same as above Shawn the Logo Fan 2006 (talk)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.