AVID:Requests for Comment/Remove Appearances Prior to the Logo's Official Debut Date
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- Closing as failed. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 15:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Synopsis
After the passing of the Initial Start/End Date/Lifespan Cleanup 2 RfC, the earliest appearances were still mentioned in the Availability section. I think it is time to remove them, since it does not really reflect the official debut date of the logo. For example, the Walt Disney Pictures page mentions the 2022 logo officially debuted on November 23, but still mentions that the logo first appeared on September 9, which does not match at all. All mentions of where the logo appeared in the Availability section must state where the logo officially debuted, and after that debut date, and not the earliest appearance in question. This will clarify and improve the articles even better. โ~๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ฉ๐ฎ-๐๐ค๐๐๐ง๐ฉ๐จ~โ (๊ง๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๊ง) | (๊ง๐พ๐ค๐ฃ๐ฉ๐ง๐๐๐จ๊ง) 16:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Support
Abstain
Abstain I'm not sure what to think of this. On one hand, I think those type of appearances can stay under a different bulleted paragraph. They serve as an interesting piece of trivia to describe where was this logo first unveiled. But at the same time, use "first appearance" and "official debut" accordingly to clarify which piece of media the logo's debut date fits in. However, I do see your point and if that doesn't sit well, then instead of removing them entirely, perhaps they can be moved to the trivia section in order to make the "Availability" section more concise. Your pick. Camenati (talk) 17:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- That might be a very better idea. โ~๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ฉ๐ฎ-๐๐ค๐๐๐ง๐ฉ๐จ~โ (๊ง๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๊ง) | (๊ง๐พ๐ค๐ฃ๐ฉ๐ง๐๐๐จ๊ง) 17:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed.
ยท Talk ยท Edits 17:22, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose This is erasing harmless info on the logos. I got the first RFC, but do we need to completely remove early appearances? I think they should still be documented. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 19:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- However, any earliest apperarances must go on Trivia, so I think you might want to pick Camenati's request. โ~๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ฉ๐ฎ-๐๐ค๐๐๐ง๐ฉ๐จ~โ (๊ง๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๊ง) | (๊ง๐พ๐ค๐ฃ๐ฉ๐ง๐๐๐จ๊ง) 22:39, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I believe the dates should be the same. Early appearances of the logos are something people want to know about. Like their earliest film debut and also their first appearances on trailers and TV spots. If they were removed, this would confuse some people that were wanting to know the first appearance of a logo. This is going to be an oppose for me unless something changes my mind. Green (talk) 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- To have that happen, this RfC must be repealed, although it will likely not happen, because speculation might return if this RfC were to be repealed. โ~๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ฉ๐ฎ-๐๐ค๐๐๐ง๐ฉ๐จ~โ (๊ง๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๊ง) | (๊ง๐พ๐ค๐ฃ๐ฉ๐ง๐๐๐จ๊ง) 11:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Oppose These appearances ARE STILL relevant to the availability of the logo, and as such are worth documenting. It's a no from me. 
(Lets chat!) 00:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per above 
(Talk to Me!) 04:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per above Eperks6 (talk) 15:38, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Comments
Comment: I wish to withdraw this request in favor of Camenati's request to move any appearances prior to the official debut date to Trivia. โ~๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ฉ๐ฎ-๐๐ค๐๐๐ง๐ฉ๐จ~โ (๊ง๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๊ง) | (๊ง๐พ๐ค๐ฃ๐ฉ๐ง๐๐๐จ๊ง) 11:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Comment: Time for a crat to close. (Lets chat!) 12:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
