AVID:Requests for Comment/Visual tracking categories + add guidelines for creating tracking categories: Difference between revisions
Adding another proposal that fits along the topic of tracking categories |
|||
Line 1:
Considering the recent introduction of the tracking categories have spread across various articles on the site, despite no proposal on this idea, there should be categories for visual-sourced logos. For example, [[Enterprise Producciones S.A.]] sourced its footage from the [[Prism Entertainment]] logo or [[Deraco Productions]] has footage from ''Terminator 2: Judgement Day''. If there are music tracking categories, why not visual-based ones?
On the other hand, as HibiscusCrown20 pointed out in the Discord, we may have an influx of redundant/useless tracking categories such as "Logos that feature the color blue" or "Logos that last more than a minute". The ones I have proposed aren't redundant considering they provide information we may not have known whereas said categories in this paragraph can be applied to way too many logos and are too obvious to point out. So, another proposal I want to make is '''guidelines for creating tracking categories'''. That way, people may know what kind of categories are desired for the wiki and not subjective/obvious ones that don't even matter.
On a side note, this, alongside said tracking category, may be somewhat of a "Logo Rip-Offs" revival except they are both informative and not opinionated. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 01:08, 28 November 2022 (UTC)▼
▲On a side note,
==Add visual tracking categories==
===Support===
{{Support|strong}}<br>We already have audio tracking categories, so why not go the full-scale?<br>[[User:Nova|★ Nova]] ([[User talk:Nova|talk]]) 01:21, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
===Oppose===
===Abstain===
==Add guidelines for tracking categories==
===Support===
===Oppose===
| |||
Revision as of 01:27, 28 November 2022
Considering the recent introduction of the tracking categories have spread across various articles on the site, despite no proposal on this idea, there should be categories for visual-sourced logos. For example, Enterprise Producciones S.A. sourced its footage from the Prism Entertainment logo or Deraco Productions has footage from Terminator 2: Judgement Day. If there are music tracking categories, why not visual-based ones?
On the other hand, as HibiscusCrown20 pointed out in the Discord, we may have an influx of redundant/useless tracking categories such as "Logos that feature the color blue" or "Logos that last more than a minute". The ones I have proposed aren't redundant considering they provide information we may not have known whereas said categories in this paragraph can be applied to way too many logos and are too obvious to point out. So, another proposal I want to make is guidelines for creating tracking categories. That way, people may know what kind of categories are desired for the wiki and not subjective/obvious ones that don't even matter.
On a side note, the visual tracking category, alongside the music tracking one, may be somewhat of a "Logo Rip-Offs" revival except they are both informative and not opinionated. Camenati (talk) 01:08, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Add visual tracking categories
Support
Support
We already have audio tracking categories, so why not go the full-scale?
★ Nova (talk) 01:21, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
