AVID:Requests for Permissions/Archive 2
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Requests for Bureaucrat
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- Closing as
successful and marking as done per overwhelming consensus. Congratulations! Agent Isai (talk) 03:22, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Closing as
User:Hb1290
talk · contribs · editcount · logs · block log · rights log
- Well hasn't this been a journey? And now it's finally time to move forward into a new era, which is something that I'd be glad to help with as part of the bureaucrat team. I believe in an inclusive, consensus driven community where all big decisions are discussed and voted on by the community not just between a few people behind closed doors. Exciting times are on the horizon for us and I'd love to be a part of that.
Talk · Edits 00:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Support
Support A strong candidate for bureaucrat, as shown by his useful contributions to the wiki in stopping rule breakers, improving and fixing several elements of the wiki, and a considerate attitude towards the community. Camenati (talk) 00:45, 22 September 2022 (UTC)- Support Slam dunk/home run/whatever you want to call it. Thatvhstapeguy (talk) 00:47, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Shouldn't it be obvious why I support them so much? They are fantastic, and are a great choice for Bureaucrat. Dreamcast99 (talk) 00:53, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support This person was bureaucrat previously IIRC, and is a good candidate. Daemonspudguy (talk) 00:58, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Your the perfect guy to look after the rebrand. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 01:34, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support This user's been a very active member of the Wiki for as long as I can remember, and I believe they demonstrate the necessary maturity as well as moderation skills to be able to handle the role of bureaucrat. Luke2505 (talk) 01:47, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Per everyone else's reasoning! HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 02:18, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Excellent choice. Highly recommended. Snelfu (talk) 08:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support He definitely deserves to be a bureaucrat for reasons already stated. --DisneyInternationalFan (talk) 13:11, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support What else is there to say that hasn't been said? --AnimeTVLogos (talk) 20:57, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support As per everyone else. Logohub (talk) 03:47, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support As with what Everyone else has said. When I think of reliable admins, HB's one of the first that comes to mind. MinistrycraftEntertainment (talk) 12:33, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- Closing as successful and marking as done per overwhelming consensus. Congratulations! Agent Isai (talk) 03:22, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Closing as
User:HibiscusCrown20
talk · contribs · editcount · logs · block log · rights log
- Wasn't this quite a ride? As a bit of background, prior to this huge round of drama that started with me and a few other admins being briefly demoted before Agent Isai of Miraheze's stewards stepped in, I was promoted to admin by Miraheze stewards in the absence of the Board of Directors after my Request for Adminship proved successful, this also being in the wake of a growing sockpuppet and other troublesome user problem. I've always wanted to join the admin team of the wiki to help out with these areas, and I have always dreamed of helping this wiki along in becoming a more welcoming and accepting place for editors who'll be able to have a say in the direction that this wiki goes, whether it be rule changes, rebrands, you name it, and not the oligarchic state the BoD brought that imposed rules on this community with no prior public communication with this wiki's community and also effectively attempted to censor any criticism of these decisions. I admittedly may not be proficient in the more techy side of MediaWiki, but I'm still hoping that I'll be able to help pull this wiki out of the state that it's been in under the BoD and help make this community feel safe and welcomed. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 02:22, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Support
- Support Proven herself to be an excellent admin so far and a great force for good in this community. Talk · Edits 02:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Admin for only around 1 month, but really demonstrated her capabilities of keeping the wiki safe from sockpuppeteers as well as alerting others of rule violations. She is an active admin in the wiki who listens to what the community wants and delivers fair punishments to persistent rule violaters. A worthy bureaucrat for sure. Camenati (talk) 02:27, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Great contributor to the wiki. Clearly a good choice. Snelfu (talk) 08:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support This user has been very active in the short period she's held admin for, and has been especially helpful in keeping the Wiki in check and free from vandalism and sockpuppets, as has been stated by others. She definitely holds the right levels of maturity and moderation skills to be a worthy candidate for bureaucrat. Luke2505 (talk) 14:48, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support In the short time she's been an admin, she's proven herself to be a strong leader, knowing the site inside and out (better than me even), dealing with spammers and sockpuppets beautifully, etc. She's more than worthy of being a bureaucrat. --AnimeTVLogos (talk) 21:03, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Very helpful admin, she's been blocking vandals and socks left and right, and has been doing a lot of help in spite of her only being promoted just a a month ago. `Logohub (talk) 03:47, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- No consensus to promote. Agent Isai (talk) 03:22, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
User:Thisisanswer
talk · contribs · editcount · logs · block log · rights log
- Welp, I'm coming to the conclusion that I should probably get my somewhat-deserved promotion here after the falling out we got. I come in to improve pages, am usually somewhat active on the wiki, and had several years underneath my belt as a moderator of the original site, so I feel like I have got what it takes to become a bureaucrat and help keep this site together when needed.
Support
- Support Definitely a good candidate. Their long experience in particular makes them a very worthy choice. Talk · Edits 05:46, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose Very good editor, but does not seem to fit the admin role very well, let alone a bureaucrat. You are not that active on this site and do nothing to respond to vandals or sockpuppeteers. However, if you get promoted to either role, I will not be upset about it. Camenati (talk) 07:46, 24 September 2022 (UTC)- Oppose While they've been with the wiki for a long time, I haven't seen enough action from them that would warrant a bureaucrat position. --AnimeTVLogos (talk) 21:42, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- While I note the very small amount of supports, there are no opposes so this request is declared successful. Congratulations! Agent Isai (talk) 02:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- While I note the very small amount of supports, there are no opposes so this request is declared
User:Logohub
talk · contribs · editcount · logs · block log · rights log
- With a new era coming, I'd like to make this wiki a more inclusive, positive environment for all of us, where big decisions are decided openly unlike with the BoD. A fresh new start for this wiki to take a more serious step in logo archiving. I've always wanted this wiki to be on the same level as more serious communities like TVArk or LMW. Logohub (talk) 03:47, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Support
- Support A great admin who’s been instrumental in some of the best changes and ideas we’ve had. Talk · Edits 05:46, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Per Hb. --AnimeTVLogos (talk) 21:36, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Per Hb. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 03:42, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- Speedy closing as invalid due to user not meeting the requirements for Bureaucrat. Agent Isai (talk) 02:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
User:NancerCLG
talk · contribs · editcount · logs · block log · rights log
- Wowee. This whole thing happened on my birthday, and I wasn't even awake to see it unfold. I just looked on the old wiki server and found that the BoD were gone and that ENunn had rebranded it as his own personal server. I then decided to make a new one and with the help of a few others, the server was pretty much identical to the old one. I'd like to become a bureaucrat as I want to help the wiki back up on it's feet and thrive once again, free of the toxic and restricting BoD. The past may have been crummy, but there's always the future to look forward to. NancerCLG (talk) 22:19, 29 September 2022 (GMT+1)
Support
Oppose
- Oppose Way far off the 1000 edit minimum, not to mention you do not edit too much on the wiki. Some of your cynical behavior also gives me doubt, not being the best for either admin or bureaucrat roles. And recently, you just voted on an already closed discussion so that gives serious doubt about your knowledge of the site's rules and what follows in wikis in general. Camenati (talk) 21:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose While you have taken the initiative to create and run the new AVID Discord server and I have noticed that you've become more receptive to criticism in the way the server is run recently, I cannot say you are ready for Bureaucrat at this time. You are currently a Registered User on this Wiki and have not even held an Admin position yet, and as has been said, currently you don't meet the minimum amount of edits. I won't comment on your recent behaviour as you have been taking steps in order to better it, which is a positive on your part. I feel like maybe you can learn the rules of the Wiki inside out and gain the moderation skills by continuing to run the Discord, while doing this you should step up your editing presence on the Wiki. Then perhaps apply for Admin (or Moderator, if it ends up being introduced) instead of trying to jump straight to Bureaucrat. I feel like you could absolutely become a Bureaucrat eventually, but not at the moment. Luke2505 (talk) 09:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Per everyone. Doctorine Dark (talk) 01:37, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Comments
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Requests for Revocation
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
User:Daltem
talk · contribs · editcount · logs · block log · rights log
- User has never utilized their administrative privileges on this site (i.e. blocking). They seemed to be fairly inactive and they have never responded to any User Report. Logohub (talk) 17:56, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
- Support Definitely nowhere near active enough to justify retaining user rights. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 18:06, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Definitely justified. PM pinter (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 14:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
User:Cruiseshipz Studios
talk · contribs · editcount · logs · block log · rights log
- User has only made two edits on this site (none of them are mainspace edits). They have never utilized their administrative privileges (i.e. blocking), seemed to be fully inactive and have never responded to any User Report. Logohub (talk) 17:56, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
- Support Definitely nowhere near active enough to justify retaining user rights. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 18:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Definitely justified. PM pinter (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 14:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
