AVID:Requests for Permissions: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Content deleted Content added
Tag: Content mostly or fully replaced
Line 5: Line 5:


==Bureaucracy==
==Bureaucracy==
{{Archive top|Closing as {{approved|successful}} per overwhelming consensus. [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 04:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)}}
{{Request|Camenati|It has been six months since I have proved what I can do as an administrator, and my contributions continue to pay off for the wiki.

Just saying that I am one of the most active users on the wiki would not be a good reason to support my promotion to bureaucracy. But when you expand that role, you can see that I have done my best in monitoring submitted drafts and edits in the moderation log, thoroughly examining them to see if they are good enough to be presented to the general public. This proves that my desire to ensure the quality of the wiki remains high and progresses from there. Since I have a very good knowledge of the site rules on the wiki, I am very aware of anyone who makes edits that do not follow site and editing guidelines, whether it would be missing examples or incomplete descriptions. Some of you may recall that I decline drafts more often than any of the other admins on the wiki, but that is because I care about seeing improvements in editors and keep the quality across pages old and new consistent. We all value a safe and inclusive community, but we also want to achieve a lot more with wisdom and productivity. I aim to keep the momentum of both the relationship between these two sides and the wiki rising for the better. If someone needs help in their articles such as adding images or describe an object, I am alert in fixing that issue, not to mention my awareness of what a lot of users are capable of when they edit pages or create articles. I keep that in mind and respect their skills, aiming to establish friendly relations with fellow users.

My knowledge of sockpuppets and rule breakers continue to catch unsuspecting sockpuppeteers with valid evidence and an immediate response whenever their name pops up in the recent changes log. For those who have previously broken rules, I expand the reasoning on templates warning them of that rule by providing them more alternatives to deal with the issue and asking if they can explain themselves in situations such as unsourced information. I would also sometimes offer to help them along the way in case they could not figure out how to follow specific guidelines properly.

This level of activity and alertness will make me a great fit for the tasks only a bureaucrat can do
|[[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 02:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)}}

====Support====
#{{Support}} Oh god, you get my vote 100%. You are by far the most helpful user i've seen here. You definetly earn this right as bureaucrat. [[File:Charlie signature AVID.png|200px|link=User:Charlie Fiddlesticks]] ([[User talk:Charlie Fiddlesticks|• '''USER TALK!''' •]]) 03:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
#{{Support}} 100%. He's one of the most dedicated users on the wiki, very helpful to other users, contributes a lot and does amazing artwork! I'm giving it a yes to Camenati, but I'd also suggest for him to be a bit more active in Discord staff discussions if he gets promoted. Good luck [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 03:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
# Camenati is perhaps the single-most prolific contributor to this wiki. His work in page expansion and in general adminship is beyond just commendable. With this in mind, I give my full {{Support}}. [[User:Eternity Media Group|Eternity Media Group]] ([[User talk:Eternity Media Group|talk]]) 03:11, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
# {{Support}} Camenati is one of our most dedicated, trusted users. He's done quite a bit for AVID since he joined. He's earned it. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 05:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
# You are a significant admin on this wiki, and this place wouldn't be the same without you. I 100% {{Support}} you in everything you do. Keep making a difference in this community. [[User:Sonicfan19198282|Sonicfan19198282]] ([[User talk:Sonicfan19198282|talk]]) 05:54, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
# There's no doubt about it, I 100+1% {{Support}} you on your quick way up (the +1% I give to charity). [[User:Dison|Dison]] ([[User talk:Dison|talk]]) 09:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
# {{Support}} If we still had '''''Strongest support''''' I would use that for this proposal. As one of the most hard-working users on AVID (and a great artist too), you have absolutely earned this promotion and I wish you best of luck. [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 10:11, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
#{{Support}} He's mega trustworthy. [[File:JrStudiosprofile.png|150px|link=User:JrStudios]]([[User talk:JrStudios|What you gonna do when clip-ons come for you!?]]) 10:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
#{{Support}} yes [[User:ForcedExcess26|ForcedExcess26]] ([[User talk:ForcedExcess26|talk]]) 12:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
#{{Support}} '''''Yes. God Yes.''''' Hardworking, at least kind, dedicated, and really active. It ticks all of the boxes! [[File:Tabit Signature.png|75px|User:Tabit]] ([[User talk:Tabit|Discussion area ¯\_(ツ)_/¯]]) 12:28, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
#{{Support}} You have made a name for yourself over your time both as an admin and a registered user as someone who provides nothing but high quality edits to the Wiki. Definitely an extremely worthy candidate for bureaucrat. [[User:Luke2505|Luke2505]] ([[User talk:Luke2505|talk]]) 14:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
#{{Support}} He's got my full support. It's been about time. <span style="font-family: 'Verdana';">[[User:Doctorine Dark|Doctorine Dark]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorine Dark|talk]])</small></span> 14:50, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
#{{Support}} Honestly I believe you deserve to be a Bureaucrat. You've done so much good things for AVID and you work so hard, you have my support and I hope you get to become a Bureaucrat! Best of luck! [[User:YoshiGaming2008|YoshiGaming2008]] ([[User talk:YoshiGaming2008|talk]]) 15:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
#{{Support}} As per everyone else above me. Good luck, Camenati. [[User:SetrkiDesu|SetrkiDesu]] ([[User talk:SetrkiDesu|talk]]) 16:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
#{{Support}} Per everyone else, I have full support for this proposal and think you'd be a perfect bureaucrat. [[User:LoganStuff|LoganStuff]] ([[User talk:LoganStuff|talk]]) 23:54, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
#{{Support}} '''''HELL YES!''''' You have my vote! You absolutely deserve bureaucracy. You've contributed so much to AVID and made it what it is today. We applaud you for your effort, and you in all honesty deserve to be a bureaucrat, with current Discord bureaucrats LogoArto and hb1290. [[User:Film & Computer Geek 2007|Film & Computer Geek 2007]] ([[User talk:Film & Computer Geek 2007|talk]]) 19:16, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

====Oppose====

====Comments====
{{Archive bottom}}


==Revocation==
==Revocation==

Revision as of 14:05, 14 December 2023

Requests for Permissions

Shortcuts:

Welcome! If you are considering requesting to become either a moderator or an administrator, you must read the Note below. Please see the Instructions section for guidance on how to request.

Note to Requesters

It is best to learn the ins and outs of being part of site staff, as it will be a big responsibility. So before you continue, please read the entirety of the AVID:Site Staff page, and take note of what we expect from a staff member.

Moderatorship

The Moderator role allows users to help out the Admins and Bureaucrats by gaining slightly elevated powers to help keep the Wiki clean and free from vandals, without the power to enact major changes to the Wiki. It is also a first step and learning experience with the Wiki's staff team for users who wish to become Admin or Bureaucrat in the future.

What are the requirements?

  • You must have at least 250 edits and they must be in good faith. (Edits prior to May 2020 on the former CLG Wiki website are counted towards this threshold)
    • In addition, these edits must not be filler/useless (i.e. overly minor changes to text that are not needed, continually editing your user page and not contributing to mainspace articles). Do not pad your edit count just to meet this criteria.
  • You must not have been strongly warned within the last 3 months or tempblocked within the last 6 months.
  • You should show a keen interest in the site and willingness to get involved with the community.
  • You should show evidence of helping out the Admin team in the past. This includes reporting users and alerting Admins, but it does not require you to have done any rollbacks in the past.
    • Actions users have taken on the Wiki's official Discord server will also be taken into account when considering users for Moderator.

I have the commitment needed for Admin. Can I skip Moderator and jump straight to Admin?
Absolutely!

Adminship

Administrators work to maintain AVID and keep it running. Administrators have a lot of power, and thereby have significant responsibility. They should use their powers to combat vandalism/spam, and keep the wiki running in an orderly manner.

I know I can handle being an administrator. What are the requirements to becoming one?
While bureaucrats do have some flexibility in deciding who becomes an administrator, there are a set of base guidelines that they look for in reviewing requests:

  • User must have registered their account 1 year ago. In addition, you must have at least 1,000 or more edits. (once again, edits from the former CLG Wiki are included)
  • User should not currently be disruptive to the wiki, intentionally or not.
  • User has not previously requested for adminship within the past 3 months.
  • User has proven knowledge of AVID and its site rules. This means that they follow editing guidelines, they fix and improve pages, they upload high quality logos and follow copyright rules, etc.
  • User is active in fighting vandalism, sockpuppetry, and policy-breakers. This means that their editing history provides evidence of assisting administrators (i.e. editing talk pages of admins to alert them of destructive users), reporting users, and undoing/rolling back poor or nonconstructive edits.

I satisfy (or mostly satisfy) all of the above requirements. What now?
Remember that when you become an administrator, you are expected to increase in activity and effectiveness. If you are granted adminship, you are expected to edit often and use your powers responsibly. You are expected to continue doing all of the above and more. This includes approving and/or rejecting edits on the moderation queue, responding to user reports, responding to messages or questions on your talk page, monitoring the recent changes, participating in wiki discussions, maintaining the front/AVID/MediaWiki pages, and constructively utilizing administrator abilities. If your request is approved and you are caught abusing your powers, bureaucrats reserve the right to remove your rights and punish you accordingly.

I am prepared to do everything you just listed and more.
If you truly believe you are a fit to become an administrator, then we wish you luck! Be aware of how the requesting process works. This is a voting process. All users are permitted to vote, whether or not they are an administrator. They will either support, oppose, or comment. After a request is published, AVID editors have a maximum of one month to vote, although closure can occur earlier at the original author's request or if consensus one way or the other is overwhelming (SNOW). After one month is up, should none of the early closure exceptions apply, a bureaucrat will review the votes and make a decision. If more than one month has passed and a bureaucrat has not responded to a request, feel free to notify a bureaucrat on their talk page or via Discord. You are not permitted whatsoever to edit in the support or oppose sections after the maximum voting period has passed. You may add or reply to comments, but you may not modify or remove others' comments. If you are caught trying to influence editors to vote or change their vote, your request will be disqualified. Cheating, incivility, and harassment is prohibited. The Instructions section below will guide you on how to publish a request.

Bureaucracy

If you are an administrator who would like bureaucracy, contact a bureaucrat on their talk page or Discord.

Instructions for Requesting

Please ensure you have read the above section. Anyone requesting must have a valid reason to why they should be promoted, and understand how to use the abilities. Use the code below to request. Fill in each parameter with what is specified (except the "Request" and "~~~~" part, leave that alone). Remember that these abilities are not given out freely or carelessly, and that they are not for fun. If your request is ignored or rejected, do not feel bad. Take the voters' advice and begin to work harder so you can request again in the future.

Code for Requesters:

{{Request|Username|Reason as to why you should be a moderator/administrator|~~~~}}
===Support===
===Oppose===
===Comments===

Example

When typing:
{{Request|User|Because...|~~~~}}
====Support====
====Oppose====
====Comments====

The following would appear:

User:User

talk · contribs · editcount · logs · block log · rights log

Because...

Support

Oppose

Comments

Instructions for Voting

All users are able to vote, but may only vote once per request. Please note that if a request has already been approved/rejected by a bureaucrat, you are no longer able to vote. In the Support section, users should sign if they think that the user has earned the abilities. In the Oppose section, users should sign if they disagree with the user being promoted. In the Comments section, users may add their opinion or questions as to why or why not the user should/nt be promoted.

Users vote using either of the following templates:
{{Support}} You make a good fit. ~~~~
Support You make a good fit. [signature]

{{Oppose}} You make a bad fit. ~~~~
Oppose You make a bad fit. [signature]

Requests

So do you think you are fit for the staff team? If so, then go ahead and make a request in any of the three sections below.

Moderatorship

Adminship

Bureaucracy

Revocation

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.