Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/Define "POV" in removing Legacy sections

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

So I see there's a bit of a conflict in what's considered "POV".

These statements include but are not limited to:

  • "this logo is a favorite of many"
  • "this logo is fondly remembered for those who watched (SHOW)"
  • "many people like this logo due to its animation"

Some consider statements like these to be good enough, and I think it's because of the fact that they assume it's not just one person, and believe most people are in agreement.

Then, on the other side, some users are removing Legacy sections written out as such, saying that they are "POV" and "unfounded". Some users have attempted to put back those sections, but ultimately get deleted again. Because of this, there is no general consensus on what or what not to consider "POV".

So, I'm making this proposal to hopefully solve this. I'm going to include a Yes-No vote, not just a typical Support-Oppose vote. The side with the larger number of votes will be added to the tutorial guidelines and will be effective following the closing of this vote.

-Compooper 12:30, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Should Legacy include "favorite of many" statements?

Don't forget to explain your reasoning.

YES

  • Big yes from me here. Most statements in this vein can be backed up by literally looking in a YouTube comments section (*cough* Starz 2016 *cough*). (name change coming soon) 13:05, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
  • It's a yes from me. Logohub (talk) 13:16, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Yeah! This is a crucial part to the legacy section (USER TALK!) 13:43, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

NO

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.