Forum:What type of logos/idents are you most fascinated with?: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
imported>YouKonade No edit summary |
imported>NothingGoesWrongNow My praise for vanity cards in a nutshell. |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Forumpost |
{{Forumpost |
||
|text=Personally, I am a BIG fan of vanity cards, film logos, station ids, bumpers and more, with vanity cards being the most fascinating. They were one of the most notable logos I ever saw, and before joining the wiki (and still today) I was watching a TON of vanity cards, because their humour, wit, design, technique, music, sound effects, description and name all say something special about a logo: “Hey! I am a logo that is very special”. |
|||
|text=Vanity cards by TV/film figures with a weird sense of absurdity |
|||
|username= |
|username=NothingGoesWrongNow |
||
|rank= |
|rank= |
||
|timestamp=19 March 2023 |
|timestamp=19 March 2023 |
Revision as of 09:30, 19 March 2023
Report post
|
Personally, I have 2 candidates:
Yeah I'm basically curious, and it would be interesting to hear yours. |
Report post
|
British logos. No matter if they're cheap, bad, gross, etc., I still love them. |
Report post
|
Personally, I am a BIG fan of vanity cards, film logos, station ids, bumpers and more, with vanity cards being the most fascinating. They were one of the most notable logos I ever saw, and before joining the wiki (and still today) I was watching a TON of vanity cards, because their humour, wit, design, technique, music, sound effects, description and name all say something special about a logo: “Hey! I am a logo that is very special”. |