Talk:Adam F. Goldberg Productions: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Latest comment: 9 months ago by AlmightyKingPrawn in topic Should a "Logo Variations" page be created for it?

Content deleted Content added
 
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


Is it because they are still? I never knew of a rule against videos of still logos. [[User:AlmightyKingPrawn|AlmightyKingPrawn]] ([[User talk:AlmightyKingPrawn|talk]]) 22:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Is it because they are still? I never knew of a rule against videos of still logos. [[User:AlmightyKingPrawn|AlmightyKingPrawn]] ([[User talk:AlmightyKingPrawn|talk]]) 22:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

:Yes, that's what I actually do when it comes to describing still logos on the wiki. [[User:SuperMax124|SuperMax124]] ([[User talk:SuperMax124|talk]]) 22:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

== Should a "Logo Variations" page be created for it? ==
Title says it all. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 18:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

:Why not? [[User:AlmightyKingPrawn|AlmightyKingPrawn]] ([[User talk:AlmightyKingPrawn|talk]]) 21:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:07, 13 December 2023

Why were all the videos removed?

Is it because they are still? I never knew of a rule against videos of still logos. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 22:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that's what I actually do when it comes to describing still logos on the wiki. SuperMax124 (talk) 22:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Should a "Logo Variations" page be created for it?

Title says it all. Gilby1385 (talk) 18:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Why not? AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 21:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.