Talk:Adam F. Goldberg Productions: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Latest comment: 9 months ago by AlmightyKingPrawn in topic Should a "Logo Variations" page be created for it?
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Should a "Logo Variations" page be created for it? == |
== Should a "Logo Variations" page be created for it? == |
||
Title says it all. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 18:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC) |
Title says it all. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 18:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
:Why not? [[User:AlmightyKingPrawn|AlmightyKingPrawn]] ([[User talk:AlmightyKingPrawn|talk]]) 21:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:07, 13 December 2023
Why were all the videos removed?
Is it because they are still? I never knew of a rule against videos of still logos. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 22:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, that's what I actually do when it comes to describing still logos on the wiki. SuperMax124 (talk) 22:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Should a "Logo Variations" page be created for it?
Title says it all. Gilby1385 (talk) 18:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Why not? AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 21:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)