User talk:Camenati

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Revision as of 17:05, 15 August 2024 by CookieJarTVNo (talk | contribs) (→‎Hey!: new section)

Latest comment: 2 months ago by CookieJarTVNo in topic Hey!

RfC rejection

After seeing that you rejected the RfC I made today about the CinemaSins page no one cares about, I just copy-and-pasted my rant into the talk section of the page in question. Is this acceptable? TapLover (talk) 20:32, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes and if you want to call further attention to this, nominate the page for deletion. Camenati (talk) 20:35, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Elmo rocks star vandalizing the HIT Entertainment and A.K.A. Cartoon pages

Oh Camenati, a user named Elmo rock star has just vandalized both the HIT Entertainment and A.K.A. Cartoons pages.

That user needs to be banned ASAP. Michael Kenchington (talk) 19:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thames, Central and Tiger Television logos on the DVD prints of Mr. Bean

Hey Camenati, you know that on the original 1994 airings of the Mr. Bean episodes titled "Do-It-Yourself Mr. Bean" and "Mind the Baby, Mr. Bean", respectively, the 1990 "A Central Presentation for ITV" endcap appears at the end of them.

See here: (for Do-It-Yourself Mr. Bean and at around 3:26): [1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd_hXefSJaI

And for Mind the Baby, Mr. Bean: (at around 0:57): [2]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaOHR1_In1I

However, it does not appear on the DVD print of the former for unknown reasons, while the DVD print of the latter uses the 1990 "A Central Programme for ITV" endcap instead, see here (at around 8:11): [3]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cx-DyxXyLNs

That endcap is also exactly the same as the one that was shown on the 1991 reruns of the second series of Thomas the Tank Engine & Friends on Children's ITV and also at the end of The Driven Man with Rowan Atkinson.

If you would like to find out which DVD prints have the Thames, Central and Tiger Television logos appear on the Mr. Bean UK DVD releases, then have a look at Alex Vintila's YouTube page to search for Mr. Bean DVD prints of episodes (albeit split into three parts). Here's the link: [4]https://www.youtube.com/@Alex94Gerrard/videos

I've also already added information about the 1969 Thames Colour Production endcap appearing at the end of the French dubbing prints of the first three Mr. Bean episodes to the Thames page last year. If you would also like to have a look at the Mr. Bean France YouTube page to which both the Thames skyline ident frontcap and endcap and the 1989 Tiger Television logo appear on, then here it is: [5]https://www.youtube.com/@MrBeanFrance/videos

Thanks in advance anyway. Michael Kenchington (talk) 16:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know more about those sources and the logos' appearances. I should consider some of them a little more when hunting for more logos (most namingly the former two). Camenati (talk) 17:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

A little clarification

If you remember me putting the "Edit section" button in a <noinclude> tag, that was a mistake. I meant to put it in an <includeonly> tag. But if you disagree with what I intended to do, it's fine. I just wanted to clear that up. Gilby1385 (talk) 16:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

No, I see your addition with the <includeonly> tag and I think that makes sense. Thank you for clearing things up. Camenati (talk) 17:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArmanPikachu

This is confusing, Camenati. Is this user a sockpuppet of abigblueworld? Shawn the Logo Fan 2006 (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

ITV reruns of The Pink Panther Show (1969)?

Hey Camenati, i was looking at the DePatie-Freleng Enterprises pages on AVID, and it says that the DFE Films logo was still intact on ITV reruns of The Pink Panther Show (1969).

Is that true or not?

Has The Pink Panther Show (1969) actually ever aired on ITV reruns?

I'm so confused. Michael Kenchington (talk) 18:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey, about the WKAR article edit. I’m fairly new to editing and I don’t know what to put for when adding a new logo when describing changes. If you could help me, that would be amazing! --Eperks6 (talk) 00:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The summary section is optional. It is helpful to tell others what changes you have made to the article, but leaving it blank is fine too. If you are documenting a new logo through page creation or new section addition, you can state "Documenting a new logo" or something similar. Camenati (talk) 00:59, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Apology to Camenati

Hi Camenati, i want to apologise for the various redundant edits that i've made on the AVID Wiki. Listen, i don't want to risk getting blocked for this, but what can i just put in instead? Something like either "is seen", "was seen", or maybe both, perhaps? I just want to redeem myself IMO. Michael Kenchington (talk) 07:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

It's alright. We pick ourselves back up from the issues we make. If you want to make these kinds of minor edits, then it would be better if you improved the grammar of pages (this doesn't mean change a single word in a sentence to a similar one). In addition to this, there are plenty of availability pages either under construction or completed for you to add more sources to without having to worry about clogging up the Availability sections on the main articles. Camenati (talk) 07:13, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

About AVID's logo for April Fools' 2024

A logo for Audiovisual Identity Database was used for April Fools' Day 2024, and it's still on the website.

I have a question about this logo, however. Could it actually be an updated logo for AVID? Shawn the Logo Fan 2006 (talk) 02:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

The logo was intended for this year's April Fools skin, so it's not a replacement for the current logo. After the wiki reverts back to the old skin, the Aero skin will be available soon as a custom skin setting option. Camenati (talk) 02:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

About the edits on the Billionfold Inc. page

Hello Camenati. I want to point out that I was not trying to start an edit war with anyone on the Billionfold, Inc. page. I was only trying to rewrite the Legacy section to make it look better, but a user on this wiki named CrazySpruiker2001 had kept reverting my edits for no reason. I know I should have discuss the conflicting issue with the user instead of reverting their edits further. I do apologize for that. TheOddKid2568 (talk) 01:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

About TVARK

Hi Camenati, i've just uploaded an image of the 1993 Scottish Television Production for ITV endcap which i've saved from TVARK last year.

BTW, TVARK is also finally back, which was just in time for its 25th birthday which was exactly last year. Also, have you ever looked at TVARK and also ever consider uploading images of ITV regional endcaps from TVARK to AVID by any chance?

Just asking IMO. Michael Kenchington (talk) 20:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

That's interesting. However, I have not fully considered searching TVARK for captures. Either I am not sure where to look for when searching primarily for logos or that archives of TV programming only contain intros, outros, or excerpts, but no logo. Camenati (talk) 20:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Rare 1990 "Produced for" Thames Television logo on the 1991 rerun of Jack the Ripper (1988 miniseries) found

Hey Camenati, i've just found a rare 1990 "Produced for" Thames Television logo which was seen on the 1991 rerun of Jack the Ripper (1988 miniseries) on ITV.

The text "PRODUCED FOR" in a Fritz Quadrata font appears above the Thames Television text on the blue triangle logo on the still variant of the 1990 ident.

Here it is (at around 1:15 to 1:20): [6]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abCJAUkl3aU

It doesn't appear on DVD and Blu-ray prints thereof, however.

Should this be added to either the Thames Television or Thames (1968-2006) pages on the AVID Wiki?

What are your thoughts about the rare "Produced for" variant of the still version of the 1990 Thames Television logo which was seen on the 1991 reruns of Jack the Ripper (1988 mini-series) on ITV? Michael Kenchington (talk) 22:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

About the Warner Bros. Family Entertainment page

Hey Camenati, I would like to discuss about the Warner Bros. Family Entertainment page. As I have seen in the edit history that the trailer version images have been deleted from 1993-2001 section of the page, I would like to point out that the trailer version is actually the medium-length logo that is seen on the Animaniacs theatrical short "I'm Mad", and not just trailers and TV spots. I was about to add the information about this, but I reconsidered this and thought I would check with you first as I do not want to re-add the images back on the page just yet. Many thanks. TPercival (talk) 08:31, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

If it is not a custom logo variation, or a variant created specifically for the piece of media, then it can go into the main page. Since the difference between this and the main logo appears to be their length rather than a theming change to the logo's overall appearance, then it would make sense to keep it on the main page rather than the trailer subpage. Camenati (talk) 08:38, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks very much. --TPercival (talk) 08:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

An interesting fact that I want to tell you

It's abut the ESPN on ABC logo. I never knew about this logo untill I watched NBA Finals and NHL Stanley Cup Finals last month. I saw this logo commonly because of those games, as they aired on ABC. Kbcars123456 (talk) 22:25, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Now that the RfC on simplifying the wiki's branding to "AVID Wiki" was a success...

We should introduce an updated logo to comply with that. It's the same logo we used last month, but the wiki's full name is replaced with "Wiki", in the same font and color as the previous text. In addition, we should change the wiki's name to simply "AVID Wiki" and update the skins (such as Drypaint) to reflect the updated logo. Shawn the Logo Fan 2006 (talk) 23:51, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The community generally agreed that the rebranding would take effect on social media handles, but not the wiki. The key word is that the "hybrid system" passed, not that everything submits to the name change. The full name isn't entirely going away. Camenati (talk) 00:05, 16 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oh... I see. I didn't realize that the rebranding was only on social media handles, not the entire wiki.

Hey!

Why did you Ban me for 3 days because of "Uncivil Behaviour"!? I Couldn't get the images to work properly and couldn't come up with a good Background, that's all! CookieJarTVNo (talk) 17:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.