User talk:If so

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Latest comment: 2 years ago by If so in topic Hey.

Welcome!




Welcome to the Audiovisual Identity Database (AVID), If so!

Let's get started, shall we?



The dos and don'ts of the site. Please follow them.


Learn the proper formatting guidelines for writing articles.


Meet the Site Staff, including Mods, Admins and Crats.


Write articles on these undocumented audiovisual identities to help the site out.


Answering some of the most commonly asked questions about AVID.


Happy editing! -


-- New user message (talk) 20:41, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey.

I don't like you adding false info in any pages (except for Universal). I saw you claiming that the 1984 logo is from 2011, it was never true as evidenced in the 1984 logo's file name. WindowsViennaFish2010 (talk) 02:30, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

We'll, from what I've seen this video (Gaumont (2011/1955) - YouTube), this logo was NOT introduced in the 1980's. It was actually introduced in 2011, and it was seen on reprints of various Gaumont classics. If so (talk) 14:30, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
No, I mean search "gaumont 1984" in google WindowsViennaFish2010 (talk) 00:32, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
For what it's worth, Logopedia dates this logo as from 1980-1995. link Talk · Edits 00:43, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Uh, okay? If so (talk) 17:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
I disagree with Hb1290. From YouTube search results, Gaumont was using this logo during the 1980's. Therefore, I can confirm that "If so" is right. / 18:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Companies can use two logos at the same time in the same period. CooleyBoy10 (talk) 00:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Gaumont made 3 logos in the 1980’s though, not 4. The Spinning Daisy logo hasn’t got any shaky effects, not one bit. If so (talk) 08:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.