User talk:RSX-798

July 2022

Hello, the article Roughcut TV (UK) needs descriptions so can you do that? Blue2000 (talk) 18:33, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, do you mind expand the Wall to Wall Media (UK) article very please? Blue2000 (talk) 19:32, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello again, can you upload the files from the ITV Studios/Other section at the Closing Logo Group - Fandom site and add them to the Granada Television's 19th and 20th sections please? Blue2000 (talk) 15:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Finding British television logos

I am intrigued in a lot of your edits on British television logos. However, there some that I couldn't find yet you were able to. I would like to know how you were able to do that such as website listings, catalog of the company's works, the videos themselves, and many more. Camenati (talk) 05:25, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Hello, the article Trans World International has not been edited since it was created in 2020 by Logohub. I edited and fixed the article myself, so can you expand it and add new images for it please? Blue2000 (talk) 23:37, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi, could you please add the images of the 9th Yorkshire Television production endcaps from Closing Logos Group Fandom very please? Blue2000 (talk) 22:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, do you mind expand the Karactaz Animation (Australia), SAMG Entertainment (South Korea), Albert Sustainable Production Certification (UK) and Daybreak Game Company articles very please? Prodigy012 (talk) 17:25, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello again, could you mind expanding the RDF Television (UK) article please? Because no one has edited that article since December 8, 2021 Blue2000 (talk) 20:42, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

The RDF Television (UK) article is started to expanding. I edited the article there all by myself, anyways could you expand it and add new images for it very please? Thank you very much. Blue2000 (talk) 22:23, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, do you mind expand the BBC Children's Productions (UK) article very please? Prodigy012 (talk) 18:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, its me Blue2000 could you please expand the Sky Originals (UK article very please? Blue2000 (talk) 16:16, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, the Touchpaper Television (UK) article needs expanding and renaming to the new name "Blacklight Television", so can you do that? Blue2000 (talk) 10:52, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, your good friend Blue2000 here to tell you that could you please add the background description for the Maverick Television article please? Also could you add images for that article as well? Thank you. Blue2000 (talk) 22:14, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello once again, you old friend Blue2000 here to tell you that could you please expand the Altitude Film Distribution (UK) article please? Thanks. Blue2000 (talk) 22:48, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello my good friend, could you create the Motion Content Group article please? Also could you add the Group M Entertainment section when you create the article? Thank you. Blue2000 (talk) 09:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Hello, your good friend Blue2000 here to tell you that I recently renamed DRG (UK) to the new name NENT Studios UK and I recently started editing that article, so can you add descriptions and add images for that article please? Also could you tell Camenati to do that as well? Thank you. Blue2000 (talk) 21:04, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, its me your friend Blue2000 here to ask you that could you create the Portman Film & Television article please? Thank you. Blue2000 (talk) 11:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello once again, your good friend Blue2000 here to tell you that could you please extend the Monkey Kingdom (UK) article by adding new images and add more descriptions very please? Thank you so much. Blue2000 (talk) 18:51, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Just to remind you

I am in the middle of splitting some ITV articles (specifically Carlton and Yorkshire). Allow me to work on these articles, please. Camenati (talk) 01:48, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Hello, its me your friend Blue2000 here to tell you that no one has ever edited the Lighthearted Entertainment article, so can you please expand the article by adding images and descriptions on that article please? Thank you so much. Blue2000 (talk) 16:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, your good friend Blue2000 here to tell you that could you mind expand the Beyond Screen Productions (Australia) articles by adding images and descriptions? Blue2000 (talk) 12:01, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, it's your friend Blue2000 to tell you that could you please expand the Kew Media Group (UK) article that I just renamed by adding descriptions and add new images? Blue2000 (talk) 15:09, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Reminder regarding your recent page addition

Hi, as a reminder, please work on blank or otherwise unfinished articles in the Draft namespace or your sandbox, as we would rather not have unfinished pages published to the mainspace for quality control reasons. Thank you! HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 03:27, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Regarding drafts

Hey, just wanted to let you know that you don't need to make draft pages of completed pages. Drafts are used to develop an article slowly. Logohub (talk) 04:34, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Reminder regarding redundant redirects

Hi, please don't blank any redundant redirects to pages, as even if they serve no use, we still need to keep track of them in order to delete them as needed. You can tag any redirects you believe are redundant or otherwise unneeded with the {{Delete}} template. Thank you! HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 03:28, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Regarding your recent image uploads

Hello! I came across your recent image uploads, and found that it did not include the name (and date seen). I know I'm no admin, but per this passed RfC, it is made compulsory to include the name and date on files uploaded from now on. Therefore, you are required to move your files to a new name. Please try keeping the file names consistent. Otherwise, I wish you a good day! Thanks in advance! Doctorine Dark (talk) 16:56, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Those recent image uploads you're referring to are just new versions of older files from before the RfC passed. As it stands though, he should still move the files to a new name per the regulation, so as to keep them consistent. PM pinter (talk) 17:04, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

My new pages

RSX-798, can you please edit these draft pages which are called M&M's and Coca-Cola please? Samsungfeg (talk) 17:50, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Add Images

Hi, can you add some images to Coca-Cola and M&M's pages please? Henrynguye6 (talk) 13:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Reminder regarding image licenses

Hi, as a reminder, please remember to tag any image you upload with the appropriate copyright license(s). We ask this to make sure that the wiki remains compliant with the United Kingdom's fair dealing system. If you need help with selecting an appropriate license, don't be afraid to ask an admin or other staff member for help. Thank you! HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 16:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Regarding your edits on User talk:Neokirby

Hello RSX-798. Please do not make threatening comments towards other users. If you have a disagreement with someone, please discuss it civilly. Thank you. Logohub (talk) 04:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Regarding your section additions to Namco and Cave

Hello, RSX-798. Please don't publish blank or otherwise unfinished sections to mainspace articles as you did with Cave, as we don't desire such additions for quality control reasons. In the future, please work on any unfinished sections in your provided sandbox, which you may find in the dropdown menu located next to your username on the top bar. Thank you! This also applies to your section additions to Namco. Camenati (talk) 17:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

This is your third warning on unfinished sections in mainspace with your contributions to Level-5. Taking into account your previous warnings on the matter, you may be temporarily blocked if you continue to do this in the future. Camenati (talk) 05:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Notification of temporary sitewide block

Hello RSX-798, it was recently brought to AVID's site staff's attention that, under the Verloren Master / RSX-648 Driveline Institute channel, you had posted numerous YouTube community posts repeatedly demanding a user respond to you in regards to if they had a certain DVD in a manner that can be considered harassment and very rude in tone. Because of this discovery, we have decided to block your account for a period of one month. Per our site rules, harassing other users is strictly prohibited, and the actions you displayed in the aforementioned community posts can also be considered a violation of our "Do not harass companies or people for logos" rule. During the length of this block, I strongly recommend you review our site rules and urge you to cease any harassment or rude behavior towards other users, whether on-wiki or off-site. Continuing to engage in such behavior may result in a lengthier to indefinite block from editing the wiki. Thank you. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 03:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

My unblock request

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RSX-798 (block log • active blocks • central auth (for registered users) • global blocks (for IP users) • contribs • deleted contribs • change block settings • unblock • filter log)

---

Request reason:

I don't want to make harassment and rude behavior on YouTube anymore, so my edits are in good faith. I have appealed to unblock the account.

Decline reason:

While it is good that you promise to not do these actions again, you will have to prove that you are able to commit to and uphold this promise and not repeat any of the offending actions or harass or be rude to other users on any site again before I can unblock your account early, so I will be declining this for now. Additionally, please do not repeatedly delete and readd or make multiple minor edits to a block request in a small window of time, as such behavior can be considered spamming and may result in your talk page access being revoked for the duration of your block. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 00:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

My unblock request (2nd attempt)

RSX-798 is asking that their block be reviewed.

RSX-798 (block log • active blocks • global blocks (for IP users) • contribs • deleted contribs • change block settings • unblock • filter log)

---

Request reason:

I was blocked yesterday because I was harassing myself on YouTube (against the rules). I was originally blocked before that, but the admins declined. There are no sockpuppet accounts allowed. I have had to edit pages seriously for a long time. I am sorry for the people who violated the rules. Thank you for your consideration.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and notify an administrator as soon as possible.
• Make sure that your unblock request will help your case. Try to provide sufficient sound reasoning as to why your block should be appealed. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=I was blocked yesterday because I was harassing myself on YouTube (against the rules). I was originally blocked before that, but the admins declined. There are no sockpuppet accounts allowed. I have had to edit pages seriously for a long time. I am sorry for the people who violated the rules. Thank you for your consideration. | 3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I was blocked yesterday because I was harassing myself on YouTube (against the rules). I was originally blocked before that, but the admins declined. There are no sockpuppet accounts allowed. I have had to edit pages seriously for a long time. I am sorry for the people who violated the rules. Thank you for your consideration. | decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I was blocked yesterday because I was harassing myself on YouTube (against the rules). I was originally blocked before that, but the admins declined. There are no sockpuppet accounts allowed. I have had to edit pages seriously for a long time. I am sorry for the people who violated the rules. Thank you for your consideration. | accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

RSX-798 (talk) 04:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

User accounts policy warning

I am posting this message in my capacity as a Steward.

RSX-798, you may have been blocked for poor behavior on related platforms but this does not have to be the end for you on the wiki. Take a break, stay away for a while, submit a reasonable apology and appeal a month or so down the line and keep your nose clean. This should be enough to make the affair 'water under the bridge'. What will make this the end for you is creating accounts to evade your block. If I have to chase down alternate accounts then you will not only lose what goodwill you have on AVID that you've acquired with over 10000 edits and two years of account time, you will also be restricted from Miraheze and have to appeal to Stewards by email if you wish to return. I would rather not do that, but this is your warning.

--Raidarr (talk) 18:56, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

RSX-798 is asking that their block be reviewed.

RSX-798 (block log • active blocks • global blocks (for IP users) • contribs • deleted contribs • change block settings • unblock • filter log)

---

Request reason:

I would like to return to editing AVID because I will not engage in further sockpuppetry, harassment, or rude behavior. All those other accounts can remain blocked. I will also do my best to comply with any other applicable policy. I think if I am given a second chance, I can be a good editor and contributor on AVID. I would not also engage in block evasion for another account. I will not attempt to use them or get them unblocked.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and notify an administrator as soon as possible.
• Make sure that your unblock request will help your case. Try to provide sufficient sound reasoning as to why your block should be appealed. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=I would like to return to editing AVID because I will not engage in further sockpuppetry, harassment, or rude behavior. All those other accounts can remain blocked. I will also do my best to comply with any other applicable policy. I think if I am given a second chance, I can be a good editor and contributor on AVID. I would not also engage in block evasion for another account. I will not attempt to use them or get them unblocked. | 3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I would like to return to editing AVID because I will not engage in further sockpuppetry, harassment, or rude behavior. All those other accounts can remain blocked. I will also do my best to comply with any other applicable policy. I think if I am given a second chance, I can be a good editor and contributor on AVID. I would not also engage in block evasion for another account. I will not attempt to use them or get them unblocked. | decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I would like to return to editing AVID because I will not engage in further sockpuppetry, harassment, or rude behavior. All those other accounts can remain blocked. I will also do my best to comply with any other applicable policy. I think if I am given a second chance, I can be a good editor and contributor on AVID. I would not also engage in block evasion for another account. I will not attempt to use them or get them unblocked. | accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

RSX-798 (talk) 00:09, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

My 3rd unblock request

RSX-798 is asking that their block be reviewed.

RSX-798 (block log • active blocks • global blocks (for IP users) • contribs • deleted contribs • change block settings • unblock • filter log)

---

Request reason:

I would like to return to editing AVID because I will not engage in further sockpuppetry, harassment, or rude behavior. All those other accounts can remain blocked. I will also do my best to comply with any other applicable policy. I think if I am given a second chance, I can be a good editor and contributor on AVID. I would not also engage in block evasion for another account. I will not attempt to use them or get them unblocked. --RSX-798 (talk) 22:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and notify an administrator as soon as possible.
• Make sure that your unblock request will help your case. Try to provide sufficient sound reasoning as to why your block should be appealed. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=I would like to return to editing AVID because I will not engage in further sockpuppetry, harassment, or rude behavior. All those other accounts can remain blocked. I will also do my best to comply with any other applicable policy. I think if I am given a second chance, I can be a good editor and contributor on AVID. I would not also engage in block evasion for another account. I will not attempt to use them or get them unblocked. --[[User:RSX-798|RSX-798]] ([[User talk:RSX-798|talk]]) 22:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | 3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I would like to return to editing AVID because I will not engage in further sockpuppetry, harassment, or rude behavior. All those other accounts can remain blocked. I will also do my best to comply with any other applicable policy. I think if I am given a second chance, I can be a good editor and contributor on AVID. I would not also engage in block evasion for another account. I will not attempt to use them or get them unblocked. --[[User:RSX-798|RSX-798]] ([[User talk:RSX-798|talk]]) 22:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I would like to return to editing AVID because I will not engage in further sockpuppetry, harassment, or rude behavior. All those other accounts can remain blocked. I will also do my best to comply with any other applicable policy. I think if I am given a second chance, I can be a good editor and contributor on AVID. I would not also engage in block evasion for another account. I will not attempt to use them or get them unblocked. --[[User:RSX-798|RSX-798]] ([[User talk:RSX-798|talk]]) 22:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

RSX-798 (talk) 22:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RSX-798 (block log • active blocks • central auth (for registered users) • global blocks (for IP users) • contribs • deleted contribs • change block settings • unblock • filter log)

---

Request reason:

I would like to return to editing AVID because I will not engage in further sockpuppetry, harassment, or rude behavior. All those other accounts can remain blocked. I will also do my best to comply with any other applicable policy. I think if I am given a second chance, I can be a good editor and contributor on AVID. I would not also engage in block evasion for another account. I will not attempt to use them or get them unblocked.

Decline reason:

Look RSX, I understand your intentions and acknowledge your previous involvement in editing the wiki before your ban (which has transitioned from temporary to permanent). However, the primary concern lies in your desperate attempts to regain access to the site, even resorting to sockpuppetry to continue editing. This behavior not only damages your image on this wiki, but also undermines the sincerity of your appeals, as you previously promised to adhere to the rules and avoid sockpuppetry.
In light of this situation, I echo the advice given by Hibiscus and Raidarr: it would be beneficial for you to take a break from AVID and demonstrate that you can refrain from harassing or provoking others. It is crucial to showcase improved behavior over an extended period, rather than making repetitive requests that fail to demonstrate progress. Repeatedly submitting numerous daily requests may be considered spam and can result in further consequences, including the loss of access to your talk page and the inability to appeal. Consider this your second warning on the issue.
If you can spend a significant amount of time away from AVID and exhibit genuine improvement in your conduct, either I or another admin may consider reducing the length of your block or lifting the ban entirely. However, if you persist in socking and spamming, the chances of being unblocked will unfortunately shrink to none, and you may no longer be welcome on the site. I wish you the best of luck in your recovery and potential return to editing on AVID. Camenati (talk) 00:51, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Final warning regarding off-site harassment

Hello, RSX-798. Despite numerous requests for you to take a break, you continue to desperately seek staff's attention to subvert your bans. This behavior is unacceptable, as you have previously promised for the third time to not engage in further harassment and comply with site policy. If you continue down this path, your talk page access will be revoked. It is essential that you respect the decisions made and the instructions given to you. Failure to comply will result in further consequences. This is your last opportunity to cease these actions and demonstrate understanding and cooperation. Thank you for your understanding. Camenati (talk) 22:17, 27 May 2023 (UTC)