AVID:Requests for Comment/Merge the 1st and 2nd Gracie Films logos (alongside other logos nearly identical in appearance): Revision history

28 February 2023

• curprev 07:1607:16, 28 February 2023‎ Hb1290 talk contribs‎ 3,982 bytes +82‎ +Category:Passed Requests for Comment; +Category:Closed Requests for Comment using HotCat

7 November 2022

• curprev 05:2905:29, 7 November 2022‎ Logoarto talk contribs‎ 3,900 bytes +654‎ No edit summary
• curprev 00:5800:58, 7 November 2022‎ Pingu talk contribs‎ 3,246 bytes +294‎ →‎Support

5 November 2022

• curprev 11:4811:48, 5 November 2022‎ Logoarto talk contribs‎ 2,952 bytes +190‎ →‎Support

2 November 2022

• curprev 16:4716:47, 2 November 2022‎ Compooper talk contribs‎ 2,762 bytes +163‎ →‎Support
• curprev 16:3416:34, 2 November 2022‎ FiddlesticksLogos talk contribs‎ 2,599 bytes +278‎ →‎Support

1 November 2022

• curprev 21:5021:50, 1 November 2022‎ imported>Cookiejar2004‎ 2,321 bytes +17‎ →‎Oppose
• curprev 00:1100:11, 1 November 2022‎ Trevor807 talk contribs‎ 2,304 bytes +213‎ →‎Support

31 October 2022

• curprev 19:2219:22, 31 October 2022‎ Nova talk contribs‎ 2,091 bytes +479‎ →‎Support

30 October 2022

• curprev 05:0405:04, 30 October 2022‎ Camenati talk contribs‎ 1,612 bytes −1,614‎ Somehow made a duplicate of the four options
• curprev 05:0205:02, 30 October 2022‎ Camenati talk contribs‎ 3,226 bytes +1,614‎ No edit summary
• curprev 05:0205:02, 30 October 2022‎ Camenati talk contribs‎ 1,612 bytes +1,612‎ Created page with "I find this an issue that has existed within the wiki for several years. As mentioned in the title, there are some pages where "two" (or perhaps more) logos are almost identical to each other in appearance. The Gracie Films logo is a great example of that since the 2nd logo is practically the same as the first, but with "better animation". The problem with this is that it's not only vague as to why is it its own section but that makes the wiki feel inconsistent. Mean..."