AVID:Requests for Comment/Since most production logos for companies with multiple names have their own pages for each company, why not do the same for bumpers?

The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as

passed Logoarto (talk) 14:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Since most production logos for companies with multiple names have their own pages for each company, why not do the same for bumpers?

Some home media companies have their own warnings and bumpers that come and go with each name change, so I figured we could have separate pages for those too. The exceptions would be if they shared the same warnings and bumpers between two different names. Gilby1385 (talk) 12:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Support

Support Good idea, this has never been done with warnings and bumpers, only with logos. TPatKB (AKA Mr Vadimon) (this is my talk page) 17:08, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- At least a few have, like these two. Gilby1385 (talk) 20:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Support This is a good idea, given that only a few warnings and bumpers (like those Gilby provided) have the same treatment as logos when it comes to most name changes. --AUnnamedDragon 5:42 PM, August 31, 2023 (CET)
Support · Talk · Edits 21:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

My issue is the clip-on libraries will be BROKEN. So basically the Flashbang bumpers is a primary example. Those were used after Disney rebranded. It would also force me to put the SAME bumpers in other companies. Same with the Filmreel bumper section.

(What you gonna do when clip-ons come for you!?) 00:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Support I do hate clutter so I strongly support this. Rainbow Puppy (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Abstain

Abstain As both sides do make good points, I'm in the middle. Charlie Fiddlesticks (talk) 03:43, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Oppose Although this can help cut page size, some clip-ons span separate companies. I have to put a solid NO on this one for consistency. (What you gonna do when clip-ons come for you!?) 15:25, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- That is something I had been thinking of and would be a possible exception to my proposal. Gilby1385 (talk) 15:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Oppose, as you haven't exactly provided any reasoning as to why other than "I like the idea".Eternity Media Group (talk) 01:07, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- To maintain consistency with the main pages, I guess. JrStudios has made a good point about that though. Gilby1385 (talk) 11:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.