AVID:Requests for Comment/Tabletop Simulator X AVID
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Tabletop Simulator X AVID
This will use AI To turn the logos into board games and put them on Tabletop Simulator. This will have a 2D animated announcement trailer with Ace and Vivi getting this idea- To put logos in board games.
Support
Abstain
Abstain haha funny rfc but still, not up our alley yet. We are not a big corporation and can't do these things. RFCs are for benefiting the WEBSITE. Please try harder. Only abstaining because of it being kinda funny.
(What you gonna do when clip-ons come for you!?) 00:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose I'm out.
..for now (maybe).I'm pretty sure there's already The Logo Board Game. And I doubt this is something that's up our alley, to be honest. --AUnnamedDragon 5:30 PM, October 12, 2023 (CET)Oppose Why would this be needed for an logo archive wiki community?
(• USER TALK! •) 21:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I remember someone saying this on a new forum (for now disabled), it's a really stupid and bad idea. TPatKB (AKA Mr Vadimon) (this is my talk page) 21:39, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Oppose bye what.
(таʟк) - your local toro inoue fanatic 22:13, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Thinking sensibly, why would we implement such feature on a website meant for the documentation of logos and visual identities? This is why RfCs need to be thought carefully as to what purpose it serves, how it fits into our website, and how it expects to improve the quality and satisfaction for end users. This proposal doesn't fill any criteria listed. Compooper (talk) 22:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- BOOM, this is the kind of opposition we need. TPatKB (AKA Mr Vadimon) (this is my talk page) 22:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Oppose As Compooper said, this proposal is pointless. LoganStuff (talk) 23:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.