AVID:Requests for Permissions/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
 
Line 149: Line 149:


==Adminship==
==Adminship==
{{Archive top|Closing as {{rejected|failed}} [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 14:05, 15 October 2024 (UTC)}}
{{Request|Logofan|My edits are in good faith. I have not been requested for adminship within three months.}}

===Support===
===Abstain===
# {{Abstain}} I have upgraded my vote after looking at your edit history. You do indeed have many, many, many good faith edits, and I am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt because your experience is unlike most people who make proposals like this. However, your reasoning still needs improvement. It still does not change the fact, that you have not explained much on why you really want to become administrator. But I'm willing to give you a very fair chance. Perhaps you can wait a bit, then, when the time is right, try out a Moderator request? Your edits do improve the scope of the wiki more often than not (your warning about forgetting the credits is a very minor thing compared to everything else), and I think it's only fair for me to acknowledge that fact out loud. Good work, keep it up. [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 23:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
===Oppose===
# <s>{{Oppose}} The last sentence alone speaks to me one theory: that you waited out those "three months" or whatever just for the sake of waiting those three months. I do not see much indication or explanation that you are ready to become an administrator just yet, because your proposal in writing doesn't show much of anything at all. I suggest you take some time on making yourself more known among the community as a good faith editor, rather than just saying it and hoping staff will fall for it. You all know the phrase well: "actions speak louder than words." It goes without saying that we would like to see more action from you before considering you as an administrator. [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 14:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)</s>
# {{Oppose}} While you have made helpful edits since joining, your reasoning doesn't really tell us why you think you should become an administrator. With requesting staff roles, you can't just simply say something like "I make good-faith edits" and expect support for your request off the bat. As Compooper said, you need to build up a track record of actions that'll support your case and show others you can stay committed to them, and you should also go more in-depth with your reasoning on why you should become an administrator. As suggested above, I'd recommend waiting and helping out more in ways like fixing misuses of sections, reporting users violating the rules, etc. before making another RfP. [[User:StarlightFantasy|StarlightFantasy]] ([[User talk:StarlightFantasy|talk]]) 14:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
# {{Oppose}} While you have greatly contributed to the wiki in terms of its content (and much thanks to you for that), you have not elaborated on anything else, like your other forms of contributions, and your behavior within the wiki and its community that could further justify your administratorship. For a position like an administrator, you need to do more than what you're doing, and you have to prove it to us. I advise you contribute to the community side of the wiki, like reporting users, discussing with them on ideas and issues, making and voting on proposals, etc. And once you think you've done enough, you may reconsider running for a position like an administrator again. For now, though, I'll have to oppose your candidacy. Don't think of this as rejection, however. Think of it as pointing out your flaws and what you can do to improve on them. Indeed, you show great potential, as your contributions and your dedication to your faithful acts are already promising signs. You just have a lot of room for improvement and expansion. I'm sure you can do it. :) <span style="font-family: 'Verdana';">[[User:Doctorine Dark|Doctorine Dark]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorine Dark|talk]])</small></span> 15:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
# {{Oppose}} Per others, but you putting in good edits and no real log of you getting into any mischief here is a very good start! [[File:Fiddlesticks logo.png|130px|link=User:FiddlesticksLogos]] ([[User talk:FiddlesticksLogos|• '''USER TALK!''' •]]) 22:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
# {{Oppose}} Self-explanatory. But you have a chance to be a good mod someday as others say. :) [[User:Tortuga Tonta Prods.|Tortuga Tonta Prods. (AKA Mr. Vadimon) (Formerly TPatKB)]] ([[User talk:Tortuga Tonta Prods.|this is my, yes, MY talk page]]) 23:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
# {{Oppose}} While yes, your edits are in good faith, please work on your reasoning. [[User:Kbcars123456|Kbcars123456]] ([[User talk:Kbcars123456|talk]]) 00:02, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

===Comments===
{{Archive bottom}}
{{Archive top|Closing as {{approved}}. Welcome to the admin team, EMG! [[User:VortexArto|VortexArto]] ([[User talk:VortexArto|talk]]) 02:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC)}}
{{Archive top|Closing as {{approved}}. Welcome to the admin team, EMG! [[User:VortexArto|VortexArto]] ([[User talk:VortexArto|talk]]) 02:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC)}}
{{Request|EternityMediaGroup|So, as some of you may have noticed, I stepped down as a moderator recently. I've taken this time to boost my edut count, as I feel that was the only thing blocking me from joining the admin team. I've contributed significantly to the project over my several years on-site, including writing the original description for the DWA 2019 logo, as well as some quality-of-life edits, such as clearing out opinionated comments and misuse of the technique section. During my time as moderator, I tried to respond quickly and efficiently to as many issues as the public wanted, a mentality I continue to utilise on the Discord server. I feel like I'm ready to take the next step, and I hope you feel I am too.|[[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 13:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)}}
{{Request|EternityMediaGroup|So, as some of you may have noticed, I stepped down as a moderator recently. I've taken this time to boost my edut count, as I feel that was the only thing blocking me from joining the admin team. I've contributed significantly to the project over my several years on-site, including writing the original description for the DWA 2019 logo, as well as some quality-of-life edits, such as clearing out opinionated comments and misuse of the technique section. During my time as moderator, I tried to respond quickly and efficiently to as many issues as the public wanted, a mentality I continue to utilise on the Discord server. I feel like I'm ready to take the next step, and I hope you feel I am too.|[[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 13:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)}}
Line 166: Line 182:
===Comments===
===Comments===
{{Archive bottom}}
{{Archive bottom}}

==Bureaucracy==
==Bureaucracy==
{{Archive top|Closing as {{approved|successful}} per overwhelming consensus. [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 04:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)}}
{{Archive top|Closing as {{approved|successful}} per overwhelming consensus. [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 04:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)}}

Latest revision as of 13:36, 26 October 2024

Moderatorship








Adminship



Bureaucracy


Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.