Forum:Should nameless logos be considered logos?

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Revision as of 04:17, 15 May 2022 by Camenati (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Forumheader|General Discussion}} {{Forumpost |text=I've seen "logos" such as the Film Field Productions opening credit as well as the First National Movies "logo" and many Pakistani intros that starts with street views of a city or a mosque and I don't think they should be called logos. I think those intros have a different purpose than to display their company names in the opening, whether it'd be...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


avatar
Camenati
User
15 May 2022

Reply or edit
Report post



I've seen "logos" such as the Film Field Productions opening credit as well as the First National Movies "logo" and many Pakistani intros that starts with street views of a city or a mosque and I don't think they should be called logos. I think those intros have a different purpose than to display their company names in the opening, whether it'd be for religious reasons, crediting others, or simply hyping up the viewer for the movie.

What do you think?

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.