Forum:Should nameless logos be considered logos?: Revision history

5 June 2022

• curprev 17:3117:31, 5 June 2022‎ imported>TVB‎ 2,351 bytes +268‎ No edit summary
• curprev 07:0307:03, 5 June 2022‎ Logoarto talk contribs‎ 2,083 bytes +196‎ No edit summary
• curprev 06:4306:43, 5 June 2022‎ Timpbskid23 talk contribs‎ 1,887 bytes +266‎ No edit summary

4 June 2022

• curprev 13:5713:57, 4 June 2022‎ imported>TVB‎ 1,621 bytes +152‎ No edit summary
• curprev 13:5013:50, 4 June 2022‎ CooleyBoy10 talk contribs‎ 1,469 bytes +211‎ No edit summary
• curprev 06:0706:07, 4 June 2022‎ Timpbskid23 talk contribs‎ 1,258 bytes +177‎ No edit summary

3 June 2022

• curprev 18:4818:48, 3 June 2022‎ CooleyBoy10 talk contribs‎ 1,081 bytes +233‎ No edit summary

17 May 2022

• curprev 08:0508:05, 17 May 2022‎ Timpbskid23 talk contribs‎ 848 bytes +177‎ No edit summary
• curprev 08:0408:04, 17 May 2022‎ Timpbskid23 talk contribs‎ 671 bytes +1‎ They are logos, the Pakistani ones have in-credit text after or before the "logo" so that makes them logos.

15 May 2022

• curprev 04:1704:17, 15 May 2022‎ Camenati talk contribs‎ 670 bytes +670‎ Created page with "{{Forumheader|General Discussion}} {{Forumpost |text=I've seen "logos" such as the Film Field Productions opening credit as well as the First National Movies "logo" and many Pakistani intros that starts with street views of a city or a mosque and I don't think they should be called logos. I think those intros have a different purpose than to display their company names in the opening, whether it'd be..."