Forum:Should nameless logos be considered logos?
| Report post
|
I've seen "logos" such as the Film Field Productions opening credit as well as the First National Movies "logo" and many Pakistani intros that starts with street views of a city or a mosque and I don't think they should be called logos. I think those intros have a different purpose than to display their company names in the opening, whether it'd be for religious reasons, crediting others, or simply hyping up the viewer for the movie. What do you think? |
| Report post
|
They are logos, especially the Pakistani ones, who have in-credit text before or after the "logos". |
| Report post
|
I agree with Camenati. These aren't really logos, they're in-credit texts/opening quotations/etc. They might be better suited for Company Bumpers. |
| Report post
|
They are actually logos! But let's not start chaos here. Just the in-credit parts make them a logo. |
| Report post
|
The only in-credit logos that count on this wiki are things like the Mark Goodson Television Productions logo, not this. |
