AG Producciones: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:36, 24 April 2024

Background

AG Producciones is a short-lived production company that made a TV Show called "Diamita Show".

Logo (February 26, 1991-December 1, 1997)

Visuals: First, we see the Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios template with the filmstrips but without the lion. Then, under this template, there is the word "AG Producciones" in bold text under a gold backdrop. Also, two people from the show pop out. Once they do, they start roaring like a lion. Then, they grab each others heads and start screaming like crazy. Fade to black.

Variants:

In Diamita Show episodes titled "Cenmenterio Pal Pito 1 & 2", the audio is a little different and the audio is off-center.
In "Diamita Show Forever", the logo is longer.

Technique: Live-action.

Audio: The audio from the MGM/UA Home Video logo.

Audio Variants: The audio has half the beats in the off-center version.

Availability: It appears on episodes of The Diamita Show.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Draft|decline=Yes|decliner=Camenati|reason=<br>1. The Visuals is partially lacking in detail, specifically with the last second of the logo sequence excluding the "mess with each other" part. The logo doesn't quite end with that and the concluding sentence is an awkward way to finish off the Visuals section. In addition to this, it contains use of a first-person pronoun, when articles should be written in a neutral point-of-view. Also lacking in detail is the extended variant brought up when documenting "Diamita Show Forever"'s variant.<br>2. The audio variant in this logo is rather vague and does not feel like a variant. It is a case where the difference is so minimal, the result is unintentional and unnoticeable. Unless more detail can be provided as to what makes the audio variant stand out, it should be cut. The term "off-center" seems to refer more towards visuals rather than audio.<br>3. Moreover with the audio, it is not just the MGM/UA fanfare, as there is the dialogue of the two men.<br>4. The background feels unnecessary. Describing the company as "an entity that created a show" is something that is already brought up later in the article. Cases where the background provides necessary information is when the company's history is described. There is also the "short-lived" adjective, but it feels misused in this case. A company doesn't feel "short-lived" if their logo lasted for several years unless there is a source that indicates they shut down sooner rather than later.
-{{Draft
-|submit=Yes
-|decline=Yes
-|decliner=Camenati
-|reason=# Several of the descriptions are not specific enough, such as the actions described in the logo (what are they doing specifically than simply messing with each other?), a lack of mention of the logo's appearance (e.g., ribboned filmstrips and text), and some of the sentences only describe a single action rather than function as a complete sentence.
-# The audio variant in this logo is rather vague and does not feel like a variant. It is a case where the difference is so minimal, the result is unintentional and unnoticeable. Unless more detail can be provided as to what makes the audio variant stand out, it should be cut.
-# Moreover with the audio, it is not just the MGM/UA fanfare, as there is the dialogue of the two men.
-# YouTube is not a primary source for TV shows unless posted by an official channel or the show in question is a webseries.
-# The descriptions should be next to the subheads (except for the Variants (if there is more than one), which should be in bullet points).
-# The Chronology template is unnecessary, as the company did not rebrand to a different name.
 }}
 <!-- Do not remove the template above until the draft is in mainspace -->