Failed proposals
AVID:Requests for Comment: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
<tabber> |
<tabber> |
||
2024= |
2024= |
||
'''Passed proposals''' |
|||
*[[/A page on identifying common symbols, icons, instruments, etc./]] |
|||
'''Failed proposals''' |
'''Failed proposals''' |
||
*[[/Remove "Logo-Related Sins Given in CinemaSins" page/]] |
*[[/Remove "Logo-Related Sins Given in CinemaSins" page/]] |
Revision as of 20:06, 6 January 2024
Welcome to AVID's Requests for Comment page.
Requests for Comment (RfCs) are a way to gather community feedback and consensus on certain proposals, ideas, and issues which require the community's approval and assent in order to be applied.
Guidelines
- RfCs should be opened about matters concerning the wiki as a whole, such as policy changes, enabling and disabling extensions, and features and ideas which would have significant effect on the wiki as a whole. Do not use this page to start discussions on page-specific matters, such as merges, splits, single category renames or deletions, except where a dispute pertaining to a single page is so significant that discussion on the article talk page has failed to effectively resolve it.
- Once a proposal is created, it will automatically be added to the list of drafted proposals. When a proposal has been submitted for review, it will automatically move to the submitted requests list. Once approved by two staff members, it will be manually moved by a bureaucrat to the open list. Closed proposals will automatically be moved to the closed list.
- If the drafted proposal has been rejected by two staff members and left with no revisions within the next seven days, it may be closed as failed.
- Voters are given four options to submit their input or comments in the proposal: support, abstain, oppose, and comment. The latter is used to ask questions, provide new ideas to add onto the proposal, etc. Comments are not an alternative voting option. When writing your reasoning, please be sure to behave in a civil, courteous manner per user conduct guidelines.
- Proposals, both drafted and open, are typically closed by a bureaucrat after seven days. However, an administrator, moderator or other suitable member of site staff may close it prematurely in the event that:
- The proposal is invalid, and is in violation of the above guideline.
- Additionally, if the proposal is a violation of site rules, the proposal will be deleted and administrative action may be taken against your account.
- Another ongoing proposal has the same purpose as the one created.
- The author has made a comment stating that they want to retract the ongoing proposal. Please note that you may not close your own proposal without administrative approval.
- After two days, if there are 10 votes supporting or opposing a proposal, and there are no competing votes, the request is subject to be closed under the snowball clause. Additionally, in the case where a proposal gains 20 votes supporting or opposing it with no competing votes in its first day, the proposal may be closed immediately without the two-day grace period.
- The proposal is invalid, and is in violation of the above guideline.
- When a proposal is in the process of being drafted or voted, edits related to the RFC should not be made prematurely.
How to submit a proposal
To submit a new proposal, enter a page title for the proposal that you are planning to submit in the text box below and click the "Create or edit" button. From there, enter the title of your proposal in the Request title field and, in the Description field below, type out what your proposal is about and what it'll aim to do once passed. Make sure to be as clear and concise as possible with the details of your proposal so that the community will know what exactly they will be voting on. When you are ready to submit your proposal, click "Save page".
Create a new proposal
Open requests (Refresh List)
Closed requests
Failed proposals
- Theme song descriptions
- I think that the page for the News Intros section will be created.
- Hypocritical Logos
- Feature color links for Administrators and Bureaucrats
- Remove the audios that are in "Visuals" and place them in "Audio"
- Please merge with TV Tropes, and speaking of which, Make laconics for logos
- Please for the next april fools prank in 2024 make it Pikachu speak!
- Tabletop Simulator X AVID
- Bringing Back Nicknames In Logo Descriptions
- Music/Sounds section revamp
- Prevent oddly-specific descriptions of clips used in logos from appearing on pages
- I want to see the AVID icons that i see on "Explore","Logo pages" and etc.
- Is thumb your CLG Wiki/Avid.wiki mascot?
- Make a version for smartphones and Nintendo Switch
- Do you have send to me 3D BLENDER FOX MAX to model
- do you have the fox searchlight pictures model
- do you have the 20th century fox 1994 improved model
- New AVID Slogan
- Since MDY and DMY date formats are being used accordingly, why not use the YMD date format as well?
- Availability rename
- Video links for logos without pages
- Special Implementations
- Can you add the tecnokena logo
- Make new positions for both the wiki and other AVID projects and add interim members while implement breaks within certain positions
- Bring back scare factor!
- List of Shortest Logos
- List of Longest Logos
- Logo Rip-Offs
- Implementing News Opens
- Appeal for AVID Discord server?
- Reimplementing Print Logos
- Shall we have time belt bumpers?
- Make a statement in support of the WGA/SAG-AFTRA strike
- Port the Drypaint theme to Wikiforge
- Allow people to vote on featured pages and images for categories
- permission to edit Walt Disney Classics and Connecticut public television
- How about graphics information?
- Logo contests for actual companies
- Change the website URL to av.id
- When will the splash screen portal have content
- Get rid of the Moderator role
- How about Brazilian image campaigns?
- Prohibit future YouTube uploads
- Require a video for most logos on the wiki
- Article rename template
- New sections; The return of Scare and Cheesy Factors
- Create a "needs grammar help" template akin to NeedsImages
- Add "(tentative)" for logos yet to debut
- Removal of the moderation extension
- A new AVID channel for cable TV?
- Introduce an "Arbitration" system
- Remove Appearances Prior to the Logo's Official Debut Date
- Unlicenced image sorting bot
- Image licence bot
- Add 'Music/Sounds' to logo variants
- Keep the good-old Getting Started images...
- we will revert clg wiki to avid on april 2
- Adding Variant Pages
- Official AVID Subreddit
- April Fools' Day 2023: Which CLG Wiki logo shall we use?
- Allow copyrights exemptions for pictures only for templates
- Change "Location" to "Country" name in infobox section
- New User Introduction Page or Forum
- Proposers cannot vote on their own RFC
- Remove the mascots from the wiki.
- Add Featured Image Nominations to the sidebar
- A custom logos page
- Introduce Bots on this Wiki
- How about a template for a missing-in-action logo variation?
- Move almost all video game logos' "availability" tiers to "uncommon" as a minimum
- Shift the "User Reports" page to major rule violations only
- Adding City, Town and State/Province names to the Category section and Infobox Location section
- Controversial logos section
- Ultra rare to extinct category
- New rules for friend requests
- Change Music/Sounds to Music/SFX
- Can You Put All "Legacy" On All AVID Pages?
- Ban RfC votes with no writing
- Why do we want the old AVID name "CLG Wiki" back?
- Negatively-recieved logos section
- let's add 13 new fonts
- Have Captions for All Images
- Change "Music/Sounds" into "Music/SFX"
- Adding more stuff.
- Make an off-topic section
- Making a new mascot
- Restructure the RfC Voting System
- Ban lengthy "Strongest oppose since" intros
- Logos with Stolen Content section
- Restructure and Rename the Availability Section
- Redefine and rename the Reason section
- Bring back the Nicknames subheading
- Upscaling images